Responsible AI in the courts

LULU Legal’s mission includes monitoring how courts adopt and regulate AI and participating in public discussions about how to use it responsibly.

Follow changes across courts

Our monitoring priorities include federal and state court rules, standing orders, filing instructions, and policies for court administration. We aim to make it easier to find the issuing court, see who a policy covers, and tell when it takes effect.

Participate in public discussion

We aim to contribute through public comment when courts invite input and through discussions with the legal profession. We support policies that spell out who reviews AI output, how confidential information is protected, and how errors are corrected.

Resources from the courts

  • The Northern District of California explains why filers should verify AI-generated citations and check their assigned judge’s standing orders for disclosure requirements. Northern District of California AI guidance
  • The California judiciary sets requirements for court policies governing generative AI use by court staff and by judicial officers working outside their adjudicative role. California Rule of Court 10.430
  • The federal judiciary explains how members of the public can provide input on proposed federal rule changes. U.S. Courts public input guide
Read about responsible AI in practice